RAPE SUPPORT CAMPAIGN TO JOIN FORCES WITH SURVIVORS TRUST FOR QUIZ NIGHT
13 February 5.30 for 6pm start
Monroe's Rock Cafe
On 13th February campaigners, local organisations and general knowledge buffs will come together for a fun evening to raise funds and awareness for survivors of sexual abuse. The ultimate goal is a centre to provide support for rape and sexual abuse victims in Reading.
Welcome to my blog. I am using it to keep you updated on my work as a councillor for Battle ward, Chair of the Art and Heritage forum and an activist for Unite the Union. I cover the issues affecting Battle ward and Reading residents. There may also be the occasional random post about things I am interested in.
Featured post
Question to council: William Marshal
Richard Stainthorp to ask the Lead Councillor for Culture Heritage and Recreation: William Marshal As I am sure the Lead Councillor is awar...
7 Feb 2013
6 Feb 2013
Open letter to Alok Sharma - Residents Parking Fact Check!
UPDATE: 6 March 2013
Well I've still not had a reply. I hope he doesn't treat his other constituents like this but, having spoken to a few, he does!
Well I've still not had a reply. I hope he doesn't treat his other constituents like this but, having spoken to a few, he does!
Dear Mr Sharma
In reference to your recent ‘report back to Battle
Ward’. I was surprised to see you claim
credit for persuading the council to:
- Increase the number of free books of visitor permits to households located in a permit parking zone from one to two.
- Begin issuing visitor permits, valid until 10am the following day, rather than 8am.
- Look favourably upon, and within reason grant, requests for allocation of visitor permits above the total official annual allowance of seven books per household.
I am sure you will
recall that the changes you claim to have reversed were brought in by the
Conservative/Lib Dem coalition council in 2010/2011. You did not object to these changes when your
Conservative colleagues on the Council were making them and you suggest the
changes were not properly consulted, presumably by the Conservative/Lib Dem
coalition?
Only at a later date did you object to these changes AFTER
the Labour controlled Council had already reversed the unpopular and unfair
changes to the residents parking scheme by increasing the number of free books
of visitor permits to two and pledging to return the 10am cut off time once the
existing stock of permits has been used.
As a Labour council we have listened to residents and made
the changes they asked for when we were back in control of the council.
We have also recently re-affirmed our commitment to the first
parking permit being free and we ensure any changes to the residents parking
scheme are fully consulted, as you well know.
I hope to see more care taken in your claims in future
literature.
Yours sincerely
Sarah Hacker
Labour Councillor, Battle Ward
UPDATED:
Evidence!
Press at the time: The article in the Reading Chronicle makes it clear he was criticising the Conservative/Lib Dem coalition yet on his leaflet (below) makes it seems he was criticising Labour! Both articles make it clear the unpopular changes he refers to were made by the coalition and that they had already been changed by Labour when Alok Sharma decided to speak up! I wonder if we'll get a leaflet correcting these mistakes?
Reading Chronicle October 2011
Get Reading October 2011
UPDATED:
Evidence!
Press at the time: The article in the Reading Chronicle makes it clear he was criticising the Conservative/Lib Dem coalition yet on his leaflet (below) makes it seems he was criticising Labour! Both articles make it clear the unpopular changes he refers to were made by the coalition and that they had already been changed by Labour when Alok Sharma decided to speak up! I wonder if we'll get a leaflet correcting these mistakes?
Reading Chronicle October 2011
Get Reading October 2011
![]() |
| Never mind the picture's in Abbey ward too! |
5 Feb 2013
Reading Labour supports Equal Marriage - and calls on Reading’s two Tory MPs to do the same
Reading & District Labour Party Media Release
3rd February 2013
Reading Labour are calling on Conservative MP’s Alok Sharma and Rob Wilson to vote in favour of the Equal Marriage Bill coming before Parliament this Tuesday (5th February), which allows same sex couples the right to get married.
3 Feb 2013
Race For Life - What Have I Done?
Well, I've signed up for the Race for Life. I've had too many family and friends touched by cancer to do nothing.
If anyone remembers me from my days at Meadway Secondary school, they'll remember by complete disengagement with all PE apart from swimming and dance. I hate running - I don't see the point unless I'm sprinting for a 17 bus but I like a challenge and the Race for Life will be just that!
I am going to start training soon and you'll probably see me huffing and puffing around the streets of Battle ward. If you do see me, please say hello or shout some encouragement - I'll need it.
I have set myself the target to raise £100 but I would love to raise more for Cancer Research UK so if you can, please sponsor me.
http://www.raceforlifesponsorme.org/sarah-hacker
I have a button top-left too that takes you to my fundraising page. Anything you can spare will be appreciated.
I'll be running the morning race on Sunday 21 July at Prospect Park.
Thanks
If anyone remembers me from my days at Meadway Secondary school, they'll remember by complete disengagement with all PE apart from swimming and dance. I hate running - I don't see the point unless I'm sprinting for a 17 bus but I like a challenge and the Race for Life will be just that!
I am going to start training soon and you'll probably see me huffing and puffing around the streets of Battle ward. If you do see me, please say hello or shout some encouragement - I'll need it.
I have set myself the target to raise £100 but I would love to raise more for Cancer Research UK so if you can, please sponsor me.
http://www.raceforlifesponsorme.org/sarah-hacker
I have a button top-left too that takes you to my fundraising page. Anything you can spare will be appreciated.
I'll be running the morning race on Sunday 21 July at Prospect Park.
Thanks
2 Feb 2013
Battle 106 - Sharma has missed the point entirely
Just got a leaflet through my door from Alok Sharma asking Labour councillors to honour their pledge to spend the Battle 106 money on healthcare.
He does understand that the money was never going to be spent on healthcare doesn't he? It was going to provide a building to house healthcare services that were to be provided by the Primary Care Trust (PCT). Not a single penny was going to pay a nurses wage or buy so much as plaster. The PCT took that healthcare away because of cuts to the NHS.
When the PCT pulled the healthcare rug from under Battle residents feet at the end of 2011 he didn't care (see here). Shouldn't he then have expressed his outrage that Battle residents were having a service they wanted taken away from them then? Shouldn't he have lobbied the PCT to restore this funding? He did nothing.
He has not contacted us about this money, just used it as a cheap political football. He has seen who we have selected as our parliamentary candidate and realised he needs to actually do something for residents if he wants any chance of keeping his parliamentary seat. But rather than engage in a useful way, he has decided to do his own thing.
Why should he and his petition decide what this money should be used for (it won't - the consultation will)? He hasn't given residents any options. He is telling them. People from outside the borough, let alone outside the immediate Battle are can sign his petition. Why should they tell Battle residents what they want?
Battle councillors and Reading Borough Council are going to consult local residents and ASK them what they feel is important to them and how they want the money spent. Nothing has been decided and nothing's been ruled out. We have already started work on the consultation. We ask, not tell!
He does understand that the money was never going to be spent on healthcare doesn't he? It was going to provide a building to house healthcare services that were to be provided by the Primary Care Trust (PCT). Not a single penny was going to pay a nurses wage or buy so much as plaster. The PCT took that healthcare away because of cuts to the NHS.
When the PCT pulled the healthcare rug from under Battle residents feet at the end of 2011 he didn't care (see here). Shouldn't he then have expressed his outrage that Battle residents were having a service they wanted taken away from them then? Shouldn't he have lobbied the PCT to restore this funding? He did nothing.
He has not contacted us about this money, just used it as a cheap political football. He has seen who we have selected as our parliamentary candidate and realised he needs to actually do something for residents if he wants any chance of keeping his parliamentary seat. But rather than engage in a useful way, he has decided to do his own thing.
Why should he and his petition decide what this money should be used for (it won't - the consultation will)? He hasn't given residents any options. He is telling them. People from outside the borough, let alone outside the immediate Battle are can sign his petition. Why should they tell Battle residents what they want?
Battle councillors and Reading Borough Council are going to consult local residents and ASK them what they feel is important to them and how they want the money spent. Nothing has been decided and nothing's been ruled out. We have already started work on the consultation. We ask, not tell!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
